McKinney v. Arizona – PJI files Amicus Brief

supreme-court.jpg

The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to consider whether current laws apply when reviewing old capital sentences. In the case of James McKinney, a case in which he should have been tried by a jury and received a judicial verdict instead, his attorneys are seeking justice. 

PJI’s Ben Cohen notes that McKinney is “one of the few defendants on death row in America sentenced to death by a judge, not a jury.” The case, which has serious mitigating factors, such as McKinney’s PTSD (which was not widely recognized when McKinney was originally tried) demands the review of a full jury. 

Read the amicus brief here.

Read more about the case in this Law360 Article

Previous
Previous

PJI’s Extreme Heat Case Settles

Next
Next

SCOTUS to Reconsider Split Jury Verdicts, in PJI case Ramos v. Louisiana